Element 68Element 45Element 44Element 63Element 64Element 43Element 41Element 46Element 47Element 69Element 76Element 62Element 61Element 81Element 82Element 50Element 52Element 79Element 79Element 7Element 8Element 73Element 74Element 17Element 16Element 75Element 13Element 12Element 14Element 15Element 31Element 32Element 59Element 58Element 71Element 70Element 88Element 88Element 56Element 57Element 54Element 55Element 18Element 20Element 23Element 65Element 21Element 22iconsiconsElement 83iconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsElement 84iconsiconsElement 36Element 35Element 1Element 27Element 28Element 30Element 29Element 24Element 25Element 2Element 1Element 66

Die kompetenzielle Bedeutung der Grundrechtsschranken

Die kompetenzielle Bedeutung der Grundrechtsschranken

Some fundamental rights may be interfered with "by or on the basis of a law", others may only be restricted "on the basis of a law", and before a constitutional amendment in 1968 there were also fundamental rights that could only be restricted "by a law".

The discussion about whether these differences in wording have competence-related significance in the sense that encroachments on the fundamental rights in question may only be made directly by law without subsequent administrative execution ("by a law") or only by administrative execution ("on the basis of a law") is older than the Basic Law itself.

In his basic contribution to fundamental rights dogmatics, Tobias Mast discusses conceivable interpretations and argues for a norm-specific interpretation of their limits.

Mast, Tobias (2023): Die kompetenzielle Bedeutung der Grundrechtsschranken [The Competent Significance of Fundamental Rights Barriers], In: Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts (AöR) 148 (2023), pp. 154-203.

Die kompetenzielle Bedeutung der Grundrechtsschranken

Some fundamental rights may be interfered with "by or on the basis of a law", others may only be restricted "on the basis of a law", and before a constitutional amendment in 1968 there were also fundamental rights that could only be restricted "by a law".

The discussion about whether these differences in wording have competence-related significance in the sense that encroachments on the fundamental rights in question may only be made directly by law without subsequent administrative execution ("by a law") or only by administrative execution ("on the basis of a law") is older than the Basic Law itself.

In his basic contribution to fundamental rights dogmatics, Tobias Mast discusses conceivable interpretations and argues for a norm-specific interpretation of their limits.

Mast, Tobias (2023): Die kompetenzielle Bedeutung der Grundrechtsschranken [The Competent Significance of Fundamental Rights Barriers], In: Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts (AöR) 148 (2023), pp. 154-203.

About this publication

Authors

Dr. Tobias Mast

Year of publication

2023

RELATED KEYWORDS

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive the Institute's latest news via email.

SUBSCRIBE!