Element 68Element 45Element 44Element 63Element 64Element 43Element 41Element 46Element 47Element 69Element 76Element 62Element 61Element 81Element 82Element 50Element 52Element 79Element 79Element 7Element 8Element 73Element 74Element 17Element 16Element 75Element 13Element 12Element 14Element 15Element 31Element 32Element 59Element 58Element 71Element 70Element 88Element 88Element 56Element 57Element 54Element 55Element 18Element 20Element 23Element 65Element 21Element 22iconsiconsElement 83iconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsElement 84iconsiconsElement 36Element 35Element 1Element 27Element 28Element 30Element 29Element 24Element 25Element 2Element 1Element 66

Das Sondervotum beim Bundesverfassungsgericht

Das Sondervotum beim Bundesverfassungsgericht

The doctoral thesis of our former colleague Dr Matthias K. Klatt was published by Mohr Siebek in April 2023.

Content
Judges have been able to issue dissenting opinions on Senate decisions of the Federal Constitutional Court since December 1970. After a very long political and academic discussion about the introduction of this instrument, dating back to 1877, the special vote has now been established for over 50 years. Matthias K. Klatt offers an empirical analysis of the court's practice and determines the functions of the special vote.

To the Publication (in German)
About the author
Matthias K. Klatt supported the research and teaching of Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Schulz, with whom he worked from November 2018 to 2021 as a research assistant at the Chair of Media Law and Public Law, including its theoretical foundations, at the University of Hamburg. He took over the coordination function between the university and the HBI. Afterwards, he worked at the Institute until the end of May 2022. He is currently a legal trainee at the Hanseatic Higher Regional Court.

Klatt, M. K. (2023): Das Sondervotum beim Bundesverfassungsgericht [The Special Vote at the Federal Constitutional Court]. Mohr Siebek. DOI 10.1628/978-3-16-161120-9



Hamburg, 4 May 2023

Das Sondervotum beim Bundesverfassungsgericht

The doctoral thesis of our former colleague Dr Matthias K. Klatt was published by Mohr Siebek in April 2023.

Content
Judges have been able to issue dissenting opinions on Senate decisions of the Federal Constitutional Court since December 1970. After a very long political and academic discussion about the introduction of this instrument, dating back to 1877, the special vote has now been established for over 50 years. Matthias K. Klatt offers an empirical analysis of the court's practice and determines the functions of the special vote.

To the Publication (in German)
About the author
Matthias K. Klatt supported the research and teaching of Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Schulz, with whom he worked from November 2018 to 2021 as a research assistant at the Chair of Media Law and Public Law, including its theoretical foundations, at the University of Hamburg. He took over the coordination function between the university and the HBI. Afterwards, he worked at the Institute until the end of May 2022. He is currently a legal trainee at the Hanseatic Higher Regional Court.

Klatt, M. K. (2023): Das Sondervotum beim Bundesverfassungsgericht [The Special Vote at the Federal Constitutional Court]. Mohr Siebek. DOI 10.1628/978-3-16-161120-9



Hamburg, 4 May 2023

About this publication

Year of publication

2023

RELATED KEYWORDS

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive the Institute's latest news via email.

SUBSCRIBE!