Element 68Element 45Element 44Element 63Element 64Element 43Element 41Element 46Element 47Element 69Element 76Element 62Element 61Element 81Element 82Element 50Element 52Element 79Element 79Element 7Element 8Element 73Element 74Element 17Element 16Element 75Element 13Element 12Element 14Element 15Element 31Element 32Element 59Element 58Element 71Element 70Element 88Element 88Element 56Element 57Element 54Element 55Element 18Element 20Element 23Element 65Element 21Element 22iconsiconsElement 83iconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsElement 84iconsiconsElement 36Element 35Element 1Element 27Element 28Element 30Element 29Element 24Element 25Element 2Element 1Element 66

Weltweite Löschpflichten für rechtswidrige Inhalte auf digitalen Plattformen vor dem österreichischen OGH

Weltweite Löschpflichten für rechtswidrige Inhalte auf digitalen Plattformen vor dem österreichischen OGH

In the journal Computer und Recht, Matthias C. Kettemann, Anna Sophia Tiedeke, Georg Kraml, Felicitas Rachinger and Clara Rauchegger write about the geographical scope of deletion obligations on digital platforms and show whether the criticism of censorship of online content is justified.
 
To the article (in German)

Abstract
When courts order obligations to delete unlawful content on digital platforms, the question arises as to the geographical scope of these orders. The Austrian Supreme Court addressed this question in two leading decisions in 2020, ORF v. Facebook and Glawischnig-Piesczek v. Facebook. In ORF/Facebook, the Supreme Court concretised the relevant requirements formulated by the ECJ in the Glawischnig-Piesczek case. In Glawischnig-Piesczek/Facebook, it did not rule out global obligations to delete unlawful online content, but avoided dealing further with this sensitive issue. Nevertheless, there are some fears that the Glawischnig-Piesczek/Facebook decision could open the door to global censorship of online content based on the law of a single state. The article shows whether and to what extent this criticism is justified.
In the journal Computer und Recht, Matthias C. Kettemann, Anna Sophia Tiedeke, Georg Kraml, Felicitas Rachinger and Clara Rauchegger write about the geographical scope of deletion obligations on digital platforms and show whether the criticism of censorship of online content is justified.


Kettemann, M. C.; Kraml, G.; Rachinger, F.; Rauchegger, C.; Tiedeke, A. S. (2021): Weltweite Löschpflichten für rechtswidrige Inhalte auf digitalen Plattformen vor dem österreichischen OGH: Der mühsame Weg zur Entfernung von Äußerungsrechtsverstößen in Social Media [Global Obligations to Delete Illegal Content on Digital Platforms before the Austrian Supreme Court: The Arduous Path to the Removal of Breaches of the Law of Expression in Social Media]. In: Computer und Recht, 37 (3), pp. 154-159. https://doi.org/10.9785/cr-2021-370306

Weltweite Löschpflichten für rechtswidrige Inhalte auf digitalen Plattformen vor dem österreichischen OGH

In the journal Computer und Recht, Matthias C. Kettemann, Anna Sophia Tiedeke, Georg Kraml, Felicitas Rachinger and Clara Rauchegger write about the geographical scope of deletion obligations on digital platforms and show whether the criticism of censorship of online content is justified.
 
To the article (in German)

Abstract
When courts order obligations to delete unlawful content on digital platforms, the question arises as to the geographical scope of these orders. The Austrian Supreme Court addressed this question in two leading decisions in 2020, ORF v. Facebook and Glawischnig-Piesczek v. Facebook. In ORF/Facebook, the Supreme Court concretised the relevant requirements formulated by the ECJ in the Glawischnig-Piesczek case. In Glawischnig-Piesczek/Facebook, it did not rule out global obligations to delete unlawful online content, but avoided dealing further with this sensitive issue. Nevertheless, there are some fears that the Glawischnig-Piesczek/Facebook decision could open the door to global censorship of online content based on the law of a single state. The article shows whether and to what extent this criticism is justified.
In the journal Computer und Recht, Matthias C. Kettemann, Anna Sophia Tiedeke, Georg Kraml, Felicitas Rachinger and Clara Rauchegger write about the geographical scope of deletion obligations on digital platforms and show whether the criticism of censorship of online content is justified.


Kettemann, M. C.; Kraml, G.; Rachinger, F.; Rauchegger, C.; Tiedeke, A. S. (2021): Weltweite Löschpflichten für rechtswidrige Inhalte auf digitalen Plattformen vor dem österreichischen OGH: Der mühsame Weg zur Entfernung von Äußerungsrechtsverstößen in Social Media [Global Obligations to Delete Illegal Content on Digital Platforms before the Austrian Supreme Court: The Arduous Path to the Removal of Breaches of the Law of Expression in Social Media]. In: Computer und Recht, 37 (3), pp. 154-159. https://doi.org/10.9785/cr-2021-370306

About this publication

RELATED KEYWORDS

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive the Institute's latest news via email.

SUBSCRIBE!