Element 68Element 45Element 44Element 63Element 64Element 43Element 41Element 46Element 47Element 69Element 76Element 62Element 61Element 81Element 82Element 50Element 52Element 79Element 79Element 7Element 8Element 73Element 74Element 17Element 16Element 75Element 13Element 12Element 14Element 15Element 31Element 32Element 59Element 58Element 71Element 70Element 88Element 88Element 56Element 57Element 54Element 55Element 18Element 20Element 23Element 65Element 21Element 22iconsiconsElement 83iconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsElement 84iconsiconsElement 36Element 35Element 1Element 27Element 28Element 30Element 29Element 24Element 25Element 2Element 1Element 66

Terror-Propaganda online: Die Schranken der Meinungsfreiheit in Deutschland und den U. S. A

Heldt, A. (2017): Terror-Propaganda online: Die Schranken der Meinungsfreiheit in Deutschland und den U. S. A [Terror Propaganda Online: The Barriers of Freedom of Expression in Germany and the US]. In: Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht (NVwZ) 2017 (Aufsätze Online [Online Articles]), p. 1658.

Heldt, A. (2017): Terror-Propaganda online: Die Schranken der Meinungsfreiheit in Deutschland und den U. S. A [Terror Propaganda Online: The Barriers of Freedom of Expression in Germany and the US]. In: Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht (NVwZ) 2017 (Aufsätze Online [Online Articles]), p. 1658.

About this publication

Authors

Amélie Pia Heldt, Maître en droit

Year of publication

2017

RELATED KEYWORDS

freedom of opinion • terrorist propaganda • media and telecommunications law

Related projects and publications

Projects
Publications
All
CI_Global-digital-human-rights-network.jpg

Human Rights Online

Global Digital Human Rights Network (GDHRNet)

The Global Digital Human Rights Network (GDHRNet) will systematically explore the theoretical and practical challenges posed by the online context to the protection of human rights.
CI_T-REX_Matthias-Kettemann.jpg

Deletion Practices in Online Communication Rooms

T-REx – Taxonomy of Rights and Expressions for Freedom of Expression Governance Research

This project aims to gain insights into deletion practices in online communication spaces and creates a taxonomy of deleted postings from the online forums of a large Austrian daily newspaper and a German question-answer portal.  
Diss_Amélie-Pia-Heldt_WirkungderMeinungsfreiheit_Hans-Bredow-Institut.png

PhD Project

The Effect of Freedom of Expression in Social Networks

Is user-generated content on private communication platforms protected by freedom of expression? In her PhD project, Amélie Heldt focuses on the effect of the fundamental right on freedom of expression on the Internet.
Macht der Informationsmediäre Erscheinungsformen, Strukturen und Regulierungsoptionen -Hans-Bredow-Institut.png

Manifestations and Regulatory Options

The Power of Information Intermediaries

In support of the political discourse on services like search engines and social networking services, this report provides a structured view on information intermediaries and  possible approaches of regulating them.  
229908_Vorsprung-durch-Rechtsbruch_Hans-Bredow-Institut.png

PhD Project

Advantage by Breach of Law?

Market participants violate existing rules governing the media sector in order secure a competitive advantage. In his dissertation, Martin Lose examines judicial subjects that interface the breach of law according to § 3a UWG (Act Against Unfair Practices) and the information and communication...
CI_Amelie-Heldt_Intensivere-Drittwirkung.jpg

Dissertation Published

Intensivere Drittwirkung

In her dissertation thesis, Amélie Heldt asks whether information intermediaries such as social networks are or should be bound by freedom of expression when they moderate users' posts and comments. Based on a constitutional, comparative and interdisciplinary analysis, she advoc...
CI_Martin-Fertmann_HBI.jpg

Intermediaries vs. States or Intermediaries and States: Democracy in the Post-Intermediation Age

In their conference paper, Martin Fertmann and Matthias C. Kettemann write about intermediaries and freedom of expression. The conference paper is available as an open access publication.   Artikel available for download (pdf) Abstract Humans are social beings. We experience ourselves through...
CI_Martin-Fertmann_HBI.jpg

Platform Regulation

Private Macht und private Gewaltenteilung

Who should determine what could be said on digital platforms? Martin Fertmann and Matthias Kettemann write on Tagesspiegel Background about how institutions can be designed for this purpose, where the risks lie and which role the Facebook Oversight Board plays.   To the article (online, in Germ...
CI_Martin-Fertmann_HBI.jpg

Twitter in India

Twitter’s Modi Operandi: Lessons from India on Social Media’s Challenges in Reconciling Terms of Service, National Law and Human Rights Law

In their article on the Verfassungsblog, Dr Sangeeta Mahapatra, Martin Fertmann and PD Dr. Matthias C. Kettemann write about the recent dispute between Twitter and the Indian government and what this means for human rights in India. You can read the article here Abstract “The Internet is sp...
CI_Kettemann_Wer die Macht hat.jpeg

Interview

Wer die Macht hat: Ein Interview über Meinungsfreiheit, Regeln und Verantwortung auf Online-Plattformen

In pro | Christliches Medienmagazin, Matthias C. Kettemann talks about freedom of opinion, rules and responsibility and about the power of Facebook and Co. over communication on the internet.   Download the article here (pdf, in German) Abstract Under German law, a Twitter chancellor like Trum...
show more

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive the Institute's latest news via email.

SUBSCRIBE!