Element 68Element 45Element 44Element 63Element 64Element 43Element 41Element 46Element 47Element 69Element 76Element 62Element 61Element 81Element 82Element 50Element 52Element 79Element 79Element 7Element 8Element 73Element 74Element 17Element 16Element 75Element 13Element 12Element 14Element 15Element 31Element 32Element 59Element 58Element 71Element 70Element 88Element 88Element 56Element 57Element 54Element 55Element 18Element 20Element 23Element 65Element 21Element 22iconsiconsElement 83iconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsElement 84iconsiconsElement 36Element 35Element 1Element 27Element 28Element 30Element 29Element 24Element 25Element 2Element 1Element 66

Kommunikation in Krisen

Kommunikation in Krisen

This working paper shows communicative processes in the current COVID-19 crisis based on systematic literature research and interviews with experts from different stakeholder areas. It was compiled within the framework of the project "Communication in Crises" funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF).

Download working paper (PDF, in German)
 

Summary
The project "Communication in Crises" analyses communicative processes in crises. These are understood as an event-related social uncertainty, as a result of which a temporary, dynamic social context emerges to cope with this uncertainty. Based on systematic literature research and interviews with experts from different fields, communicative processes in the current COVID-19 crisis will be identified.
 
In order to systematically describe communication in crises, a figuration-theoretical approach is pursued, which understands communication in crises as an interdependent network and focuses on the actors involved in communication, their respective action-guiding orientations and communicative practices. The focus is on the specific logics of actors from the fields of:
 
  • Public health and safety,
  • Science and research,
  • The public and journalism,
  • Group-specific interests,
  • Living environment of the individual members of society.
 
The perception of communication in the crisis and the different guidelines for action are examined based on existing findings from research and supplementary interviews with experts. Guided by the figuration-theoretical approach, firstly the processual character of crises and their communicative management will be identified. Guided by the figuration-theoretical approach, firstly the processual character of crises and their communicative management is elaborated. Secondly, the diversity of actors involved in the communicative negotiation of their management. And finally, the challenges that arise from the different role- and living environment-related demands, expectations and action orientations will be highlighted.
 
On this basis, various cross-cutting challenges for communication in crises are identified. These are described in the form of areas of tension in which communication in crisis can take place, for example between
 
  • Consonance and polyphony,
  • Warning and reassurance,
  • Simplification and differentiation.
  • Comprehensive information and guidance,
  • Individual responsibility and regulation.
 
Recommendation
With regard to the question of how the nature of communicative relations between actors from politics, science, media and civil society can contribute to strengthening crisis resilience, it is recommended that communication in crises should
 
  • Take into account all relevant actor perspectives;
  • Make their own position recognisable and transparent in their respective perspectives;
  • Develop and implement communication strategies that are appropriate for the target group;
  • Strengthen dialogue-based communication strategies rather than abandoning them in a crisis;
  • Create cross-cutting bodies or communication structures that systematically identify the communication needs of the different groups of actors and make them available to the actors involved.

Broer, Irene; Hasebrink, Uwe; Lampert, Claudia; Schröder, Hermann-Dieter; Wagner, Hans-Ulrich; assisted by Corinna Endreß (2021): Kommunikation in Krisen [Communication in Crisis]. Hamburg: Hans-Bredow-Institut, September 2021 (Arbeitspapiere des Hans-Bredow-Instituts | Projektergebnisse Nr. 59) DOI: https://doi.org/10.21241/ssoar.74139



 

Kommunikation in Krisen

This working paper shows communicative processes in the current COVID-19 crisis based on systematic literature research and interviews with experts from different stakeholder areas. It was compiled within the framework of the project "Communication in Crises" funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF).

Download working paper (PDF, in German)
 

Summary
The project "Communication in Crises" analyses communicative processes in crises. These are understood as an event-related social uncertainty, as a result of which a temporary, dynamic social context emerges to cope with this uncertainty. Based on systematic literature research and interviews with experts from different fields, communicative processes in the current COVID-19 crisis will be identified.
 
In order to systematically describe communication in crises, a figuration-theoretical approach is pursued, which understands communication in crises as an interdependent network and focuses on the actors involved in communication, their respective action-guiding orientations and communicative practices. The focus is on the specific logics of actors from the fields of:
 
  • Public health and safety,
  • Science and research,
  • The public and journalism,
  • Group-specific interests,
  • Living environment of the individual members of society.
 
The perception of communication in the crisis and the different guidelines for action are examined based on existing findings from research and supplementary interviews with experts. Guided by the figuration-theoretical approach, firstly the processual character of crises and their communicative management will be identified. Guided by the figuration-theoretical approach, firstly the processual character of crises and their communicative management is elaborated. Secondly, the diversity of actors involved in the communicative negotiation of their management. And finally, the challenges that arise from the different role- and living environment-related demands, expectations and action orientations will be highlighted.
 
On this basis, various cross-cutting challenges for communication in crises are identified. These are described in the form of areas of tension in which communication in crisis can take place, for example between
 
  • Consonance and polyphony,
  • Warning and reassurance,
  • Simplification and differentiation.
  • Comprehensive information and guidance,
  • Individual responsibility and regulation.
 
Recommendation
With regard to the question of how the nature of communicative relations between actors from politics, science, media and civil society can contribute to strengthening crisis resilience, it is recommended that communication in crises should
 
  • Take into account all relevant actor perspectives;
  • Make their own position recognisable and transparent in their respective perspectives;
  • Develop and implement communication strategies that are appropriate for the target group;
  • Strengthen dialogue-based communication strategies rather than abandoning them in a crisis;
  • Create cross-cutting bodies or communication structures that systematically identify the communication needs of the different groups of actors and make them available to the actors involved.

Broer, Irene; Hasebrink, Uwe; Lampert, Claudia; Schröder, Hermann-Dieter; Wagner, Hans-Ulrich; assisted by Corinna Endreß (2021): Kommunikation in Krisen [Communication in Crisis]. Hamburg: Hans-Bredow-Institut, September 2021 (Arbeitspapiere des Hans-Bredow-Instituts | Projektergebnisse Nr. 59) DOI: https://doi.org/10.21241/ssoar.74139



 

About this publication

RELATED KEYWORDS

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive the Institute's latest news via email.

SUBSCRIBE!