Element 68Element 45Element 44Element 63Element 64Element 43Element 41Element 46Element 47Element 69Element 76Element 62Element 61Element 81Element 82Element 50Element 52Element 79Element 79Element 7Element 8Element 73Element 74Element 17Element 16Element 75Element 13Element 12Element 14Element 15Element 31Element 32Element 59Element 58Element 71Element 70Element 88Element 88Element 56Element 57Element 54Element 55Element 18Element 20Element 23Element 65Element 21Element 22iconsiconsElement 83iconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsElement 84iconsiconsElement 36Element 35Element 1Element 27Element 28Element 30Element 29Element 24Element 25Element 2Element 1Element 66

Indirect Interventions in Fundamental Rights by Deterrence?

Indirect Interventions in Fundamental Rights by Deterrence?

Verlagsinformation

Oermann, M.; Staben, J. (2013): Mittelbare Grundrechtseingriffe durch Abschreckung? Zur grundrechtlichen Bewertung polizeilicher „Online-Streifen“ und „Online-Ermittlungen“ in sozialen Netzwerken [Indirect Interventions in Fundamental Rights by Deterrence? On the Evaluation of Fundamental Rights of Police Patrols and Investigations Online]. In: Der Staat – Zeitschrift für Staatslehre, Öffentliches Recht und Verfassungsgeschichte, 52(4), pp. 630-661.

Indirect Interventions in Fundamental Rights by Deterrence?

Verlagsinformation

Oermann, M.; Staben, J. (2013): Mittelbare Grundrechtseingriffe durch Abschreckung? Zur grundrechtlichen Bewertung polizeilicher „Online-Streifen“ und „Online-Ermittlungen“ in sozialen Netzwerken [Indirect Interventions in Fundamental Rights by Deterrence? On the Evaluation of Fundamental Rights of Police Patrols and Investigations Online]. In: Der Staat – Zeitschrift für Staatslehre, Öffentliches Recht und Verfassungsgeschichte, 52(4), pp. 630-661.

About this publication

Authors

Dr. Markus Oermann

Year of publication

2013

RELATED KEYWORDS

Neue Regulierungsformen • fundamental rights

Related projects and publications

Projects
Publications
All
219909_Staatliche-Informationstaetigkeit_Hans-Bredow-Institut.png

PhD Project

Legal Principles of Information Activities of the State

Unlike its citizens, the state cannot lean on the basic right of free speech when it comes to its communciation. In his PhD project, Tobias Mast exmaines the legal requirements of the state’s communication with its citizens.  
229911_Algorithmen_Persoenlichkeitsrecht_Hans-Bredow-Institut.png

PhD Project

Legal Treatment of Algorithms

Every app, every website, every search query uses algorithms. In his PhD project, Felix Krupar analyses the legal classification of algorithmic communication.  
229910_Haftungsprivilegien_Hans-Bredow-Institut.png

PhD Project

The Legal Concept of Interference Liability

In which cases is a WiFi provider liable for illegal downloads made by a third party using its internet access? Is YouTube to be held responsible for uploads infringing the copyright? Such questions cannot be answered conclusively by the written law and are a solved by the construction of interferen...
321401_HERMES_Hans-Bredow-Institut.png

Media Regulation of On Demand Services

HERMES

Regulation designed primarily for linear media such as traditional scheduled television services has not adequately kept pace with the growth of non-linear media and the Internet. Even though traditional linear media may still be strong and even in the dominant role regarding overall media consumpti...
10_Konvergenz-Nutzerperspektive-Kommunikationsmodi_Hans-Bredow-Institut.png

Problems and Possible Solutions

Convergence Report

Increasing technical convergence presents media regulation with new challenges and calls into question traditional media law. The report by Winfried Kluth and Wolfgang Schulz gives an overview of problem areas and provides possible solutions, as commissioned by the German states and as a preparation...

Blog Article

Mit Normen gegen Internet-Fragmentierung

Matthias C. Kettemann writes about the normative change on the Internet in his curent article on the blog of the Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG).  Recently, Daniel Lambach argued here that cyberspace was not right now “in danger of breaking apart”...
Kettemann_Global-Governance-Spotlight.jpg

Available as Download

Internationale Regeln für Soziale Medien: Menschenrechte wahren und Desinformation bekämpfen

Facebook, Wikipedia, YouTube and Twitter are increasingly becoming a vehicle for the strategic use of information by states (so-called dis/information operations). These platforms, which are conceptually defined as 'social media', provide their users with a wide range of opportunities to obt...
OermannDissCover181104_Hans-Bredow-Institut.jpg

New Publication

Gewährleistung der Möglichkeit internetbasierter Kommunikation – eine Vermessung des grundgesetzlichen Schutzkonzepts

Is there a "basic right to Internet access" in Germany? Dr. Markus Oermann pursued this question in his jurisprudential dissertation "Gewährleistung der Möglichkeit internetbasierter Kommunikation. Eine Vermessung des grundgesetzlichen Schutzkonzepts [Ensuring the Possibilit...
BigData_HR.png

With Contributions by the Institute

Big Data – Regulative Herausforderungen

Hoffmann-Riem, W. (ed.) (2018):  Big Data  –  Regulative Herausforderungen [Regulative Challenges]. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschafft. Edited by Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Hoffmann-Riem, LL.M. With contributions by Wolfgang Hoffmann-Riem, Gerrit Hornung, Yoan Hermstrüwer, An...
Anonym.png

Blog Post

Anonyme Äußerungen im Netz: Der Fall 4chan

Heldt, A. P. (2017): Anonyme Äußerungen im Netz: Der Fall 4chan [Anonymous Remarks on the Internet: The Case 4chan]. In: Science Blog of the HIIG. Website. Berlin: Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society. (online).
show more

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive the Institute's latest news via email.

SUBSCRIBE!