Element 68Element 45Element 44Element 63Element 64Element 43Element 41Element 46Element 47Element 69Element 76Element 62Element 61Element 81Element 82Element 50Element 52Element 79Element 79Element 7Element 8Element 73Element 74Element 17Element 16Element 75Element 13Element 12Element 14Element 15Element 31Element 32Element 59Element 58Element 71Element 70Element 88Element 88Element 56Element 57Element 54Element 55Element 18Element 20Element 23Element 65Element 21Element 22iconsiconsElement 83iconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsElement 84iconsiconsElement 36Element 35Element 1Element 27Element 28Element 30Element 29Element 24Element 25Element 2Element 1Element 66
The Public Space as a Resource for Governance

The Public Space as a Resource for Governance

The starting point of the legal analysis, drawing on social science control and communication theory, was the idea that – by using classic instruments in certain fields of regulation and with regards to certain aims of regulation - the regulation of social processes will be increasingly difficult. That the processes of differentiation, which characterise the way into information society, present themselves as a restriction for governance because they could lead to a communicative isolation of milieus or subsystems, becomes a commonality of different explanatory approaches for this phenomenon. Looking at existing studies, it became obvious that they are rarely going any further than the analysis of the problem. Building on the debate on control theory, this project sought out to reduce this deficit. This project also builds on considerations that have been developed in the course of the debate on the reformation of general administrative law, which demand an adjustment of the dogmatic of administrative law and forms of administrative actions in order to fit the needs of the information society. The following questions led the examination: Where and how are the public sphere and information management used as control instruments? Where are deficits in the regulation? And under what circumstances could further use of regulation instruments, which use the public sphere and information management as ‘control mediums’, make reaching the goal more effective? What term of ‘public’ is required by legislation – based on German Constitutional Law – and how do these instrumentalisations have to be evaluated against this background? The questions were examined by using the example of regulation in the area of communication and mass media, in particular for legal regulation that aims at influencing media content directly, and by looking at so-called new media such as digital television and computer-mediated communication.

show more

Project Description

The excursion of regulation in environmental law by environmental information was chosen in order to observe the effects of the particularities in the media sphere. Besides already existing regulatory instruments and the ones yet to be developed, the legislative process was examined as well. Legislation in complex fields like media law or environmental law has to consider its “learning ability” and changeability in order to be effective.

Project Information

Overview

Duration: 1997-2009

Involved persons

Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Schulz

Third party

Volkswagen Stiftung (Hannover) (1998-2001)

Cooperation Partner

Contact person

Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Schulz
Director (Chairperson)

Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Schulz

Leibniz-Institut für Medienforschung │ Hans-Bredow-Institut (HBI)
Rothenbaumchaussee 36
20148 Hamburg

Tel. +49 (0)40 45 02 17 0
Fax +49 (0)40 45 02 17 77

Send Mail

MAYBE YOU ARE ALSO INTERESTED IN THESE TOPICS?

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive the Institute's latest news via email.

SUBSCRIBE!