Element 68Element 45Element 44Element 63Element 64Element 43Element 41Element 46Element 47Element 69Element 76Element 62Element 61Element 81Element 82Element 50Element 52Element 79Element 79Element 7Element 8Element 73Element 74Element 17Element 16Element 75Element 13Element 12Element 14Element 15Element 31Element 32Element 59Element 58Element 71Element 70Element 88Element 88Element 56Element 57Element 54Element 55Element 18Element 20Element 23Element 65Element 21Element 22iconsiconsElement 83iconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsElement 84iconsiconsElement 36Element 35Element 1Element 27Element 28Element 30Element 29Element 24Element 25Element 2Element 1Element 66
The Law of Digitality

The Law of Digitality

The project "Law of Digitality" dealt with the question of how different fields of law (in particular private commercial and media law, criminal law, data protection and financial market law) cope with the tension between global digital communication and local legal systems and whether general trends can be identified in this respect since the turn of the millennium. The aim of the project is to develop the basis for the formulation of a theory of the right to global digitality.
show more

Project Description

The fact that there is a profound tension between the mediality of global computer networks and local law has long been known and often problematised. However, the answers of different fields of law to this challenge are hardly ever analysed in a comparative manner with the required level of detail. The same questions arise in all areas of law affected by digitisation. What claim do local legal regimes make with regard to global digital issues (jurisdiction of the courts/authorities, applicable law, scope of application of lex rei sitae)? Can a tendency be discerned in the respect according to which local laws are more easily triggered and vice versa applied with extraterritorial claims (cf. EU data protection)? Will the legal requirements for cross-border digital conduct become stricter (liability levels, regulatory density)? What is the relevance of technical standards ("Code is Law") and hybrid private-public governance structures (e.g. Memoranda of Understanding, Network Enforcement Act)?

Project Information

Overview

Duration: 2019-2020

Research programme:
RP2 - Regulatory Structures and the Emergence of Rules in Digital Communication

Third party

Exzellenzcluster Die Herausbildung normative Ordnungen, Universität Frankfurt

Cooperation Partner

Universität Frankfurt/Main (Prof. Peukert, Prof. Spiecker gen. Döhmann, Prof. Brömel, Prof. Maultzsch, Prof. Vesting)

Contact person

PD Mag. Dr. Matthias C. Kettemann, LL.M. (Harvard)
Senior Researcher "Regulatory Structures and the Emergence of Rules in Online Spaces"

PD Mag. Dr. Matthias C. Kettemann, LL.M. (Harvard)

Leibniz-Institut für Medienforschung | Hans-Bredow-Institut (HBI)
Rothenbaumchaussee 36
20148 Hamburg

Tel. +49 (0)40 45 02 17 36
Fax +49 (0)40 45 02 17 77

Send Email

MAYBE YOU ARE ALSO INTERESTED IN THESE TOPICS?

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive the Institute's latest news via email.

SUBSCRIBE!