Element 68Element 45Element 44Element 63Element 64Element 43Element 41Element 46Element 47Element 69Element 76Element 62Element 61Element 81Element 82Element 50Element 52Element 79Element 79Element 7Element 8Element 73Element 74Element 17Element 16Element 75Element 13Element 12Element 14Element 15Element 31Element 32Element 59Element 58Element 71Element 70Element 88Element 88Element 56Element 57Element 54Element 55Element 18Element 20Element 23Element 65Element 21Element 22iconsiconsElement 83iconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsElement 84iconsiconsElement 36Element 35Element 1Element 27Element 28Element 30Element 29Element 24Element 25Element 2Element 1Element 66
iLinc: Establishing a European Network of Law Incubators

iLinc: Establishing a European Network of Law Incubators

In law clinics, students consult real clients and, thus, learn on-the-job. The EU project iLINC connects media law clinics in order to network students early in their study programs with IT start-up companies.

Students have little to no practical experience in terms of counselling or relevant legal issues during their law studies. Young start-ups often lack money for a systematic legal counselling in order to assess reliable business models or legal risks. The EU-funded project iLINC wants to bring these two things together: under professional supervision, law students consult start-ups in media law clinics. The EU project has already connected many of the existing law clinics and, thus, initiated a systematic exchange of experiences.
 

show more

Project Description

The Hans-Bredow-Institut is collaborating with the Queen Mary and Westfield College at the University of London, the University of Amsterdam and the Catholic University of Leuven in order to conduct the project “iLinc: Establishing a European Network of Law Incubators that Bridge ICT Entrepreneurs and Start-Ups with Law Students”, as supported by the EU Commission. The consortium was successful in achieving financial support after competing for funding from the 7th EU general programme.
 
The project aims to support educational projects in Europe, in which students under supervision make legal expertise available to persons and firms which are unable to afford professional legal advice.

Such advice is needed, for instance, during the early phases of start-ups so that it is centres of new enterprise, above all else, which can profit from its benefits. Such “law clinics” are already a widespread part of education in the USA; in Europe they are just beginning to emerge.
In the first instance, the project is intended to highlight the most important challenges met by IT firms and to create models and instruments for fostering the exchange of experience among clinics, for instance, through joint workshops, providing material in data bases and formulating model contracts. The Hans-Bredow-Institut organized a “Practice Sharing Event” together with the HIIG in May 2015, which focused on the link between law clinics and research.
 
Alongside the four project partners and Brooklyn Law School, which is supporting the project with its advice as a consultant, we intend to include further institutions with an interest in developing their own clinics and incubators. The clinic projects at the University of Hamburg and the HIIG in Berlin should profit from this exchange of experience.
 
Project Website: http://www.ilincnetwork.eu
 

Project Information

Overview

Duration: 2013-2015

Research programme:
Further Projects

Involved persons

Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Schulz • Martin Lose • Maria Franziska Schroeder

Third party

EU-Kommission (FP7)

Cooperation Partner

Ian Walden (Projektkoordinator), Queen Mary and Westfield College an der University of London
Nico van Eik, Universität Amsterdam
Peggy Valcke, KU Leuven
Jonathan Askin, Brooklyn Law School (Associate Partner)

Contact person

Dr. Stephan Dreyer
Senior Researcher Media Law & Media Governance

Dr. Stephan Dreyer

Leibniz-Institut für Medienforschung │ Hans-Bredow-Institut (HBI)
Rothenbaumchaussee 36
20148 Hamburg

Tel. +49 (0)40 45 02 17 - 33
Fax +49 (0)40 45 02 17 - 77

Send Email

MAYBE YOU ARE ALSO INTERESTED IN THESE TOPICS?

media and telecommunications law • Neue Regulierungsformen • media law • studies

Related projects and publications

Projects
Publications
Events
All
CI_BKM-EU_Medienkonferenz_Leibniz-Institut-fuer-Medienforschung_Hans-Bredow-Institut.jpg

Conference within the Framework of the German EU Council Presidency

Coherent Media Order: Accompanying the EU Media Conference 2020

The institute will provide scientific support for the media conference in the context of Germany's 2020 EU Council Presidency and is analysing in advance the requirements of a modern European information order.
Diss_Amélie-Pia-Heldt_WirkungderMeinungsfreiheit_Hans-Bredow-Institut.png

PhD Project

The Effect of Freedom of Expression in Social Networks

Is user-generated content on private communication platforms protected by freedom of expression? In her PhD project, Amélie Heldt focuses on the effect of the fundamental right on freedom of expression on the Internet.
Macht der Informationsmediäre Erscheinungsformen, Strukturen und Regulierungsoptionen -Hans-Bredow-Institut.png

Manifestations and Regulatory Options

The Power of Information Intermediaries

In support of the political discourse on services like search engines and social networking services, this report provides a structured view on information intermediaries and  possible approaches of regulating them.  
229908_Vorsprung-durch-Rechtsbruch_Hans-Bredow-Institut.png

PhD Project

Advantage by Breach of Law?

Market participants violate existing rules governing the media sector in order secure a competitive advantage. In his dissertation, Martin Lose examines judicial subjects that interface the breach of law according to § 3a UWG (Act Against Unfair Practices) and the information and communication...
229910_Haftungsprivilegien_Hans-Bredow-Institut.png

PhD Project

The Legal Concept of Interference Liability

In which cases is a WiFi provider liable for illegal downloads made by a third party using its internet access? Is YouTube to be held responsible for uploads infringing the copyright? Such questions cannot be answered conclusively by the written law and are a solved by the construction of interferen...
CI_Staatsferne der Medien und Staat im Diskurs_Tobias Mast.jpg

Article in "Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht"

Staatsferne der Medien und Staat im Diskurs

In the "Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht" [Journal of Copyright and Media Law], Tobias Mast discusses the incongruities between the constitutional figure of state neutrality of the media and the jurisdiction on the public relations of state agencies, which has recent...
CI_Recht im Metaverse.jpg

Rules for Immersive Worlds

Einführung in die Regulierung der Metaverse

Matthias C. Kettemann, Caroline Böck and Martin Müller examine selected legal issues of rule application in the metaverse and look at future developments. Excerpt The metaverse is phenomenologically diverse; technically complex; economically endowed with much potential; challenging tradit...
CI_Transparency-or-Opacity.jpg

Editorship

Transparency or Opacity

Martin Fertmann, together with Simone Kuhlmann, Fabrizio De Gregorio, Hannah Ofterdinger and Anton Sefkow, has published an anthology with contributions from legal scholars on the problem of transparency in automated decision-making processes. The anthology is available as an open access publicatio...
CI_JMS-Report_2022.jpg

Jugendmedienschutz-Report 6/22

Folgen der sich wandelnden Regulierungsansätze im Jugendmedienschutz

Dr. Stephan Dreyer, Sünje Andresen and Neda Wysocki have published an article in the current Youth Media Protection Report. In this article, they address the systematic changes in the legal protection of minors from harmful media and the associated control advantages for interaction and communi...
CI_Tiedeke_Statification.jpg

Understanding Digital Corporations as States?

Self-Statification of Corporate Actors?: Tracing Modes of Corporate Engagements with Public International Law

In order to understand the role of large digital corporations in international lawmaking on the internet from a jurisprudential perspective, Anna Sophia Tiedeke applies Michel Foucault's model of "stateification" (Étatisation). This article is published as an open access paper b...
show more

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive the Institute's latest news via email.

SUBSCRIBE!