Element 68Element 45Element 44Element 63Element 64Element 43Element 41Element 46Element 47Element 69Element 76Element 62Element 61Element 81Element 82Element 50Element 52Element 79Element 79Element 7Element 8Element 73Element 74Element 17Element 16Element 75Element 13Element 12Element 14Element 15Element 31Element 32Element 59Element 58Element 71Element 70Element 88Element 88Element 56Element 57Element 54Element 55Element 18Element 20Element 23Element 65Element 21Element 22iconsiconsElement 83iconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsElement 84iconsiconsElement 36Element 35Element 1Element 27Element 28Element 30Element 29Element 24Element 25Element 2Element 1Element 66
24.
Januar 2018

Can Democracy Survive Big Data and Micro-Profiling in Elections?

"Can Democracy Survive Big Data and Micro-Profiling in Elections?", Panelteilnahme von J. Kulshrestha auf der Konferenz  Computers, Privacy, and Datat Protection (CPDP) am 24. Januar 2018 in Brüssel.

Infos zur Veranstaltung

Adresse

Université Saint-Louis
Boulevard du Jardin botanique 43
1000 Brussels
Belgien

Organised by Centre for Digital Democracy and Transatlantic Consumer Dialogue
Academic ** Policy ** Business **

Chair Paul-Olivier Dehaye, PersonalDataIO (CH)

Moderator Anna Fielder, Transatlantic Consumer Dialogue (UK)

Speakers Michael McEvoy, Office for Information and Privacy Commissioner of British Columbia (CA); Irina Vasiliu, DG Justice, European Commission (EU); Jeffrey Chester, Center for Digital Democracy (US); Juhi Kulshrestha, Hans Bredow Institute for Media Research (DE)

Today’s political candidates and issue campaigns are fully integrated into the growing Big Data marketing infrastructure, with more and more companies in this sphere accelerating the pace of research and innovation and promising to transform how political campaigns and elections are conducted. Data management platforms, marketing clouds, and other new data services enable information about one’s finances, health, race, ethnicity, shopping behavior, and geo-location to be combined with political interests, reading habits, and voting records. Social media and digital platforms are facilitating many of these techniques, monetizing and normalizing “fake news,” “dark posts”, and other practices, and challenging fundamental principles such as privacy, data protection, and individual autonomy. It has been widely reported that political Big Data digital micro-targeting played a role in the election of President Trump as well as the Brexit vote in the UK, and is now the subject to growing scrutiny by regulatory authorities.
  • Is the use of such technologies likely to cause harm and undermine the democratic process? What is the link between these technologies and fake news?
  • How do policy frameworks in western democracies compare, in terms of controlling political election campaigns practices?
  • What is the role of data protection legislation in protecting the privacy of voters? And what are the challenges for data protection authorities in addressing how commercial data can be sold or shared with political groups?

Ansprechpartner

Juhi Kulshrestha
Fellow im Nachwuchskolleg "Algorithmed Public Spheres"

Juhi Kulshrestha

Leibniz-Institut für Medienforschung │ Hans-Bredow-Institut (HBI)
Rothenbaumchaussee 36
20148 Hamburg

Tel. +49 (0)40 450 21 7 55
Fax +49 (0)40 45 02 17 77

E-Mail senden

VIELLEICHT INTERESSIEREN SIE AUCH FOLGENDE THEMEN?

Newsletter

Infos über aktuelle Projekte, Veranstaltungen und Publikationen des Instituts.

NEWSLETTER ABONNIEREN!