Element 68Element 45Element 44Element 63Element 64Element 43Element 41Element 46Element 47Element 69Element 76Element 62Element 61Element 81Element 82Element 50Element 52Element 79Element 79Element 7Element 8Element 73Element 74Element 17Element 16Element 75Element 13Element 12Element 14Element 15Element 31Element 32Element 59Element 58Element 71Element 70Element 88Element 88Element 56Element 57Element 54Element 55Element 18Element 20Element 23Element 65Element 21Element 22iconsiconsElement 83iconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsElement 84iconsiconsElement 36Element 35Element 1Element 27Element 28Element 30Element 29Element 24Element 25Element 2Element 1Element 66

‘X Journalism’. Exploring Journalism’s Diverse Meanings Through the Names We Give It

‘X Journalism’. Exploring Journalism’s Diverse Meanings Through the Names We Give It

Prof. Dr. Wiebke Loosen, Julius Reimer und Paul-Philip Solbach stellen in diesem Artikel gemeinsam mit ihren Co-Autor*innen Laura Ahva, Mark Deuze und Lorenz Matzat das Konzept „X Journalism“ vor: ein Werkzeug zur Beobachtung der Entwicklung des Journalismus durch die Analyse der sich stetig verändernden Journalismusbegriffe. Der Artikel ist im Fachjournal „Journalism“ bei SAGE Publications erschienen.
 
Zum vollständiger Artikel bei Sage Journals
 

Abstract
In this article we propose the notion of X Journalism as an observational tool and concept. It owes its existence to a simple observation: the evolution of journalism is accompanied by the emergence of ever-new journalism-related terms, i.e. combinations of the word ‘journalism’ with a particular modifying term that represents and signals a certain specificity and novelty. Examples include ‘robot journalism’, ‘foundation-funded journalism’, ‘cross-border journalism’, or ‘solutions journalism’ – just to name a few. To date, we have collected and mapped 166 X journalisms and have ‘crowd-categorized’ them into clusters according to the different aspects they refer to. We explore X Journalism as a concept, present our mapping, and show how it can help to cope with journalism’s increasing complexity, grasp the diversity of the field, trace its constant evolution, as well as identify patterns and interrelations between these different movements and occurrences. Through a test case of audience-related X journalisms we demonstrate an empirical application before illustrating the theoretical compatibility of X Journalism and suggesting a research agenda that highlights potentials for X Journalism-driven studies.
 
Loosen, W.; Ahva, L.; Reimer, J.; Solbach, P.; Deuze, M.; & Matzat, L. (2020): ‘X Journalism’. Exploring journalism’s diverse meanings through the names we give it. In: Journalism. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920950090
 
 

‘X Journalism’. Exploring Journalism’s Diverse Meanings Through the Names We Give It

Prof. Dr. Wiebke Loosen, Julius Reimer und Paul-Philip Solbach stellen in diesem Artikel gemeinsam mit ihren Co-Autor*innen Laura Ahva, Mark Deuze und Lorenz Matzat das Konzept „X Journalism“ vor: ein Werkzeug zur Beobachtung der Entwicklung des Journalismus durch die Analyse der sich stetig verändernden Journalismusbegriffe. Der Artikel ist im Fachjournal „Journalism“ bei SAGE Publications erschienen.
 
Zum vollständiger Artikel bei Sage Journals
 

Abstract
In this article we propose the notion of X Journalism as an observational tool and concept. It owes its existence to a simple observation: the evolution of journalism is accompanied by the emergence of ever-new journalism-related terms, i.e. combinations of the word ‘journalism’ with a particular modifying term that represents and signals a certain specificity and novelty. Examples include ‘robot journalism’, ‘foundation-funded journalism’, ‘cross-border journalism’, or ‘solutions journalism’ – just to name a few. To date, we have collected and mapped 166 X journalisms and have ‘crowd-categorized’ them into clusters according to the different aspects they refer to. We explore X Journalism as a concept, present our mapping, and show how it can help to cope with journalism’s increasing complexity, grasp the diversity of the field, trace its constant evolution, as well as identify patterns and interrelations between these different movements and occurrences. Through a test case of audience-related X journalisms we demonstrate an empirical application before illustrating the theoretical compatibility of X Journalism and suggesting a research agenda that highlights potentials for X Journalism-driven studies.
 
Loosen, W.; Ahva, L.; Reimer, J.; Solbach, P.; Deuze, M.; & Matzat, L. (2020): ‘X Journalism’. Exploring journalism’s diverse meanings through the names we give it. In: Journalism. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920950090
 
 

Infos zur Publikation

ÄHNLICHE PUBLIKATIONEN UND VERWANDTE PROJEKTE

Newsletter

Infos über aktuelle Projekte, Veranstaltungen und Publikationen des Instituts.

NEWSLETTER ABONNIEREN!